Tag: Truth

  • Coming Clean. Total Transparency.

    Coming Clean. Total Transparency.

    Dear Readers,

    I have health issues serious enough to make me housebound and isolated.

    I prayed, and an idea formed to start a blogging website; this was to continue in the Great Commission in the extremely limited circumstances I found myself in.

    I started to think of ideas, I started writing, I found that my mind was now in a fog from all the pain management, this was when I thought of using AI assistance for my Biblical blog posts.

    This did not sit well with me, and I prayed on this feeling of unease, and still I decided to continue.

    The unease never fully went away; I have been wrestling with this decision to use AI for a while now.

    My discission or discernment is that using AI to polish and tighten my writing is unfaithful to the calling and obedience to Jesus for the Great Commission.

    I have decided to write this disclaimer as I am completely stopping all blog posts with AI assistance.

    I am thinking of new ideas I can manage, like, ESV 2015 verses expounded by R.C. Sproul, The source of my new work will be from The Reformation Study Bible. See below for copyright information and permissions.

    This will help me with my health issues, but most of all, I can stop wrestling with this.

    I now discern, using AI to tighten and polish my blog posts is not faithful, as an AI has no soul, feels nothing, and has experienced nothing.

    If I have offended anyone, I am sorry. I should have listened to my heart at the beginning when I was first convicted.

    The previous Biblical blog posts, which I felt called to write on, specifically the Biblical posts, should never have been polished or the wording tightened with Artificial Intelligence.

    I hope anyone reading this understands.

    Thank You,

    Jo Blogs.

    The Reformation Study Bible

    Legal Notice & Copyright Credits

    Scripture: Quotations are from The ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway. Used by permission. All rights reserved. (Standard permissions allow for the use of up to 1,000 verses per post).

    Study Notes: Commentary excerpts are from The Reformation Study Bible™, copyright © 2015 by Reformation Trust Publishing, a division of Ligonier Ministries. (Ligonier policy allows for brief excerpts/quotes not to exceed 250 words without written permission).

    Disclaimer: This material is used for non-commercial, educational purposes. No content has been altered, and no revenue is generated from this post.

    Summary of the “Proof”:

    • Verses: You have permission for 1,000 (per the title page you found).
    • Notes: You are following the 250-word limit (per the Ligonier website policy for their resources).

    © Ligonier Ministries 2015. Used by permission. Source: Ligonier.org Official Policy Link: Ligonier Copyright Policy


    [1] R. C. Sproul, ed., The Reformation Study Bible: English Standard Version (2015 Edition) (Orlando, FL: Reformation Trust, 2015), iii–iv.

  • My Fight For Truth. Part One

    My Fight For Truth. Part One

    Note: This is a lightly updated repost of a piece I first published on 24 September 2025. If you’d like to read the original version of “My Fight for Truth – Living with the Consequences of a Medical Nightmare” with its comments and likes, you can find it below.

    How The UK NHS Tried to Ruin My Life.

    This is a personal story about my ordeal with the NHS, a journey that began with a routine blood test and ended with my life forever changed. What I learned is that sometimes, the answers we seek aren’t in a complex diagnosis, but in the most basic things around us—like in our homes.

    It all started when I went for a full blood test because of my hypothyroidism. The results came back with alarming news: I had hypercalcemia, extremely high calcium levels, along with high creatinine and signs of kidney dysfunction. My GP advised me to go straight to the local hospital’s Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) unit.

    SDEC is a diagnostic department where doctors try to figure out what’s causing symptoms, a bit like the TV series House. Over the next seven days, I went back and forth to the hospital. Each time, my blood tests showed worsening symptoms. My calcium levels had risen again, above 3.0, a point where I should have been admitted for a hydration drip, but I was sent home and told to “drink more water.” The more I drank that week, the worse I felt. I told this to the duty doctor, as I never met Dr Lok once, he was part of the team for one week that day from his desk, the Cancer and Sarcoidosis doctor, who made the final decisions, in charge of the department for that single week. This detail would be key in everything that happened next.

    A Wrong Turn: The Focus Shifts.

    Dr. Lok decided from his desk that because my symptoms resembled those of his patients, he immediately requested urgent lung scans with iodine, scan appointments that fast are unheard of in the local NHS hospital. I was injected with iodine, which works like a marker pen for CT scans. The results came back, and he pointed to a small, dark area on my lung, which he suggested might be cancer or sarcoidosis.

    I was called in the evening by phone and repeated to Dr. Lok that I was there for my kidneys and calcium levels, not a lung issue. But he insisted on a procedure: an urgent EBUS bronchoscopy was arranged. The next morning back at SDEC I was put under immense pressure and rushed into the procedure room. There was no time to think, no proper introduction from the medical staff. When I asked the junior registrar who was to perform the procedure if he had done it before, he said he had five years of training and that a consultant was present. He assured me I was in “good hands.”

    The Unthinkable Procedure.

    Before the procedure, I was injected with three different sedatives, but none of them worked. I was fully awake and conscious. The six nurses in the room were concerned and advised against continuing, but the junior registrar decided to proceed anyway.

    The moment the procedure began, I was in excruciating pain. I couldn’t scream because of the tube down my throat, so I waved my arms and stamped my feet on the bed, begging them to stop.

    This went on for an hour. I never saw the consultant in the room, but I heard the young registrar say, “I’m lost in the lungs. What do I do?” A voice from the corner of the room behind me—the consultant—replied, “I don’t know, I wasn’t watching. You’ll have to break procedure and hope you don’t spread infection.”

    He told the registrar to go back up to where the lungs split into the right and left airways and start again, which he did. After an hour of unimaginable pain, the procedure was finally over. When I asked why they didn’t stop, they simply told me I was fine. I was then rushed to the recovery area, and despite my inability to breathe properly, they brushed it off as normal and sent me home.

    The Aftermath: The Truth and The Fight.

    When I got home, I knew something was terribly wrong. My breathing was severely impacted. I called for an ambulance, and three paramedics attended. The senior paramedic, who had been through the same procedure, though sedated, said, “They don’t tell you how painful it will be after for around twenty-four hours,” and then they left after a few basic tests.

    It turns out the dark spot on my lung was nothing—no cancer, no sarcoidosis, and no bacterial infections. The procedure was completely unnecessary.

    It was then I began to question everything. I purchased some equipment, tested my tap water, and found it had a high level of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), at 440 TDS. The legal limit for undrinkable water in the UK is around 500 TDS, and my tap water was dangerously close to this limit. My theory was correct: drinking my tap water was making my condition worse. Within seven days of switching to a low-TDS spring water (which tested around 90 TDS) and then filtering it to bring the TDS down to 60, all my original symptoms normalised.

    The problem wasn’t a disease; it was my tap water.

    The fight for justice against the NHS lasted for two and a half months with the patient complaints department. They dismissed my evidence, including the water suppliers’ results confirming my findings. The hospital refused to do follow-up scans that would prove the damage to my lungs was a result of a wrong diagnosis and malpractice. I received an email from the executive of the local NHS Counties who had signed off on the complaints department’s verdict that no malpractice had taken place. Although they were sorry the procedure caused what I had outlined, they protected themselves against a mountain of proof I had presented. The complaint was swept under the carpet, and I was left with only 30% of my breathing capacity.

    I can no longer stand for long periods or do simple tasks like cooking or cleaning. As a rescue diver, I could once go down thirty to forty meters and rescue a diver without breaking a sweat. I am now left with the devastating, permanent consequences of a botched procedure that was never needed in the first place. My story isn’t about wanting sympathy; it’s about raising awareness. I’m just one of many who suffer in silence, and my experience highlights how difficult it is to find objective truth in a modern secular society, even within a trusted government service like the NHS.

    The stress over those two and a half months was so immense that I sought professional legal help, a solicitor for a “no win, no fee” arrangement. But no solicitors would take on the NHS in a legal battle for the truth and justice. I contacted the local paper, and even they didn’t want to publish against the local hospital. They use the same hospital, so I don’t blame them.

    I am grateful for every short, painful breath I can take. What would you do in my situation?

    Further reading: A follow-up, My Fight for Truth — Part Two: How Christ Sustains Me Through the Aftermath, continues this story.

    Leave a comment

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • My Fight for Truth — Part Two

    My Fight for Truth — Part Two

    This is the follow-up to My Fight for Truth — Part One, where I shared how a misdiagnosis and a botched procedure destroyed my lungs and the NHS refused to acknowledge it. This part is about the aftermath — and how Christ sustains me in it.

    How Christ Sustains Me Through the Day-to-Day Aftermath.

    Part One of “My Fight for Truth” ended with the damage already done. I had a simple blood test and a healthy pair of lungs, and with one misdiagnosis and one botched EBUS bronchoscopy, which is now a permanent disability.


    My months of fighting for accountability and truth with the NHS complaints department was swept under the rug, signed by the NHS County executive.
    The verdict was “no misdiagnosis, no malpractice.”
    And there was nothing more I could legally do. My healthy lungs were destroyed, but they say, they did nothing wrong. It’s what they always say to every life the NHS destroy.

    I had to accept their truth, the NHS had broken both my lungs, and the system had buried the real truth and changed their evidence to cover-up something that should stay in urban myths and horror movies. It should never have happened!

    So, I tried to move forward. I had no choice. I needed to try and find a way to accept this and not give up completely and finish the job the NHS started.

    The next month’s hit hard — the aftermath, the slow realisation and collapse into a new way of surviving physically alone, and the deeper truth I discovered in it all: Christ is still the One who carries me when my body and circumstances cannot.

    Before the Lung Damage.

    I must say at this point, I was already coping with the bad news that I have cervical multi-level disc degeneration and spinal fracturing, Nerve damage, bilateral tennis elbow, a history of bilateral Bell’s Palsy, diffused chronic back axial neck and shoulder,  and bilateral upper and lower limb pain, bilateral carpel tunnel syndrome, and degenerative osteoporosis. Because of all this,  I have lost three inches in height so far, I was 6ft 3 inches tall ten years ago and I was told after two years of pushing for MRI and CT scans it was caused by wear and tear.

    At fourteen I worked as a scaffolders apprentice, at the weekend and holidays for one year, working above 100ft loading out for the scaffolders, walking on one nine-inch-wide scaffold board, at fourteen that was pretty hair-raising, but I loved the views. I went and passed my UK City and Guilds in advance carpentry and joinery and  four decades on site as a chippy, as we say in the UK. Also, five years building bridges and tunnels, this was when health and safety didn’t exist. I was a rescue diver, or shepherd as we were called, every weekend for roughly two decades. The trauma and orthopaedics specialist calmly told me that my work had caused all these life changing illnesses, and I was unlucky to get it all earlier in life than most people.

    Living with the consequences, day after day.

    The aftermath didn’t arrive all at once.
    It unfolded over months — a quiet dismantling of normal life.

    Breathing while lying flat became impossible.
    The orthopaedic bed I had bought for my back pain — a substantial expense — was suddenly useless.
    My large sofa  became the only place where sleep didn’t suffocate me.

    I had an idea and ordered specialist foam from a company who made to measure pieces, basically they could make anything out of different specialty foams at any length, width, depth, and shape. After receiving my instructions, they created exactly what I needed to add to my large sofa, and to my exact measurements, curved where I needed, and the foam company in the UK covered them for me as well to be washable.
    Eventually I had to move to a medical chair on wheels which was a considerable expense, so I could rest partly upright and move through the bungalow without collapsing. I used my feet and walking cane to row myself around my bungalow.

    Practically, everything changed in my day-to-day survival.

    Washing myself became impossible with showering, as it is situated in the bath area.

    Cooking became exhausting and painful.

    Standing became dangerous, even with a new walking cane.

    Cleaning anything became unrealistic.

    Bending down became a risk to my lungs.

    My home slowly turned into a system of survival tools,

    grabbers to reach clothes, utensils, or anything on the floor.

    disposable trays, spoons, and utensils

    wipes — boxes upon boxes — for washing myself, cleaning, surviving.

    Disposable plates of every size I need, everything replaced with the disposable versions, everything I found I needed and could think of and purchase. I have it organised now, subscribed to everything disposable through the Amazon.uk website, it just turns up just before I run out.

    I found pure rubber hot water bottles with fleece covers and kangaroo pouches, these are my feet and lung warmers, which help somehow.

    My recycling bags that pile up because the “simple task” of sorting and taking out two weeks of recycling is now a military operation, especially due to my tap water being undrinkable, which if you’ve read this far, you know it caused my original symptoms of hypercalcemia, high creatinine, and kidney dysfunction. Not Cancer!

    It’s not a lifestyle; it’s triage.
    And every day requires discipline just to get through the basics.

    But here’s the truth:
    None of these things keep me going.
    They only help me cope.
    Christ is the One who keeps me alive.

    Then the letter arrived — seven months after the damage.

    Months passed after the NHS brushed everything under the carpet.
    I had accepted their refusal to admit wrongdoing.
    I had accepted that no solicitor would touch the case.
    I had accepted that no newspaper wanted to publish anything negative against the local hospital.

    I had accepted that this was my new life.

    Then, in late November, a new letter dropped through the door.

    Same executive.
    Same signature.
    Same verdict.

    But this time, it claimed the months of repeated biopsy procedure and CT appointment letters I had received weren’t sent by the doctor who pressured me —
    they were “automated.”
    A system error.
    Nothing personal.

    And then the sentence that revealed everything:

    “Other consultants have agreed with Dr Lok’s approach.”

    This made me furious all over again. Dr Lok never met me in person, not once, he went on the SDEC staff gossip which could possibly been about a different patient, which Dr Lok admitted on the phone call I recorded., he never listened to my healthy lungs, but other consultants agreed with the approach of never doing a physical inspection on any  patient before ordering an extremely invasive procedure.

    Of course, the NHS claimed others agreed with Dr Lok’s approach from his desk, never on the same day emergency unit ward.
    That’s how institutions defend themselves.

    The letter wasn’t about truth.
    It wasn’t about answers.
    It wasn’t about accountability.

    It was about posturing — a defensive manoeuvre, a way to cover themselves again and rewrite history:

    Ignoring the biopsy that proved there was no cancer or sarcoidosis.

    Ignoring the fact that the EBUS bronchoscopy was unnecessary.

    Ignoring that the junior registrar was not under supervision.

    Ignoring my tap water tests, which proved my tap water was the reason for my original blood results and symptoms, which all normalised in seven days drinking British spring water.

    Ignoring their own notes.

    Ignoring the reality that those repeated appointment letters were attempts to pressure me into another EBUS procedure that could have destroyed what remained of my lungs.

    Ignoring the main fact that Dr Lok never once met me or listened to my healthy lungs.

    That letter reopened everything, I was planning, organising, and buying survival kit for this new life forced on me.
    The injustice, The procedure, which was completely unnecessary.
    The memory of one hour that was torture.
    The harm that they all got away with by the cover-up by the NHS
    The loneliness of standing against a system that refuses truth.

    It took the wound I had tried to live with and tore it back open.

    And that’s exactly why I pray in His name, my Lord Jesus, the Christ.

    Christ in the collapse.

    This is the part that matters most.

    When the anger and grief resurfaced,
    when the memory of being ignored, pressured, and harmed hit me again,
    when the physical struggle of each day pressed down even harder —
    Christ held me.

    Not in a sentimental way.
    Not in a poetic way.
    In His way of faith, hope and love, all gifts to me.

    Christ steadied my mind when the letter tried to drag me backwards.
    Christ stopped my thoughts from spiralling into hopelessness.
    Christ reminded me that the world may refuse to acknowledge the truth,
    but God sees all things clearly.

    Christ carried the weight that my lungs and my heart could not.

    This is not positive thinking.
    This is not self-help.
    This is not “finding the strength within.”

    This is grace.
    This is the Spirit at work.
    This is what it means when Scripture says His power is made perfect in weakness.

    My strength ended months ago.
    Christ’s strength never has.

    The small hours no one sees.

    There are nights where the isolation is louder than the breathlessness. There are times when the physical, emotional, and mental pain is overwhelming.
    There are moments where the physical limitations feel endless.
    There are times where I scroll through every streaming service, unable to find a single thing that speaks to the human condition, to truth, to reality, to anything with meaning.

    I still listen to music. I enjoy my daily bread, but entertainment means nothing now.
    Distractions take a lot of effort. Christ means everything. Only truth matters. Only grace sustains. Only faith carries weight.

    Everything else is just the mechanics of surviving the day.

    Is this still life?

    It’s a question that rises sometimes.
    Is this living or just existing?
    Is this survival or purpose?

    But every time the question comes, the answer comes with it:

    “My grace is sufficient for you.”

    If His power is made perfect in weakness,
    then even this life — broken, restricted, painful, limited —
    is still a place where His glory is at work.

    I don’t have the life I had before.
    But I have Christ.
    And that is the life that cannot be taken from me.

    If Christ can carry me, He can carry you.

    I’m writing Part Two because so many people are suffering so much more than me, because someone else is fighting to breathe —
    physically, emotionally, spiritually.

    Someone else feels forgotten.
    Someone else feels crushed.
    Someone else feels like their world is falling apart and nobody sees it.

    To every person going through any personal storm, I say:

    Christ sees you, Call on His name.
    Christ sustains you, Pray in His name.
    Christ is enough, Thank Him by name.
    Christ can carry you through the storm and the  aftermath.

    My fight for truth continues.
    But thanks to Him,
    I am still here.
    Still breathing, though only about half as much as I could before.
    Still writing and reading more of other people’s writing through WordPress reader.
    Still held by His Glorious Grace.

    Leave a comment

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • The Restlessness That Points to Something More.

    The Restlessness That Points to Something More.

    Why there’s an audio version
    Some readers prefer to read at their own pace. Others (especially when eyesight, energy or health make reading harder) may find listening easier. So I’ve added an audio option—feel free to relax, sit back and listen, or carry on reading—whichever suits you best.

    The Restlessness That Points to Something More.

    Wonder begins early in life. As children, we asked questions with unguarded honesty—questions that cut beneath the surface of everyday life. We looked at the sky or the rhythm of the seasons and felt instinctively that the world was meaningful. We sensed intention, beauty, and purpose long before we could articulate any of it. The world felt alive.

    Yet growing up brings noise. Responsibilities tighten. Modern life hums relentlessly—emails, deadlines, notifications, expectations. Eventually those earlier questions fade into the background. They never truly vanish; they simply sink below the surface. Still, every now and then, something interrupts our pace—a quiet morning, a late-night drive, a moment when the world feels strangely still. And there, in the silence, the old questions rise again, as though patiently waiting to be acknowledged.

    These questions are not signs of weakness. They are, in many ways, a map leading us toward a deeper reality.

    How We Lost Our Shared Compass.

    Only a few generations ago, many in the Western world lived with a shared sense of orientation. Faith, community, tradition, and a belief in a higher purpose sat at the centre of daily life. People disagreed, yes, but most felt connected to something beyond themselves—something more stable than personal preference.

    Today that grounding has shifted. We are encouraged to craft our own identity, determine our own truth, and build our own meaning from scratch. The language is empowering, promising unlimited self-expression and total personal freedom. But this freedom comes with a hidden cost: if meaning comes only from within, then we must continually sustain it. We must invent it, protect it, and perform it.

    For many, this has not produced confidence but exhaustion. A quiet, unspoken hollowness sits just beneath the surface. The slogans of modern life promise liberation, but they leave us carrying the full weight of our own significance.

    The Quiet Experiment of Building Meaning Without God.

    Across the last century, something subtle happened. Society began an experiment—one many never consciously agreed to. Faith moved from public life to private life, then from private life to irrelevance. God shifted from the centre to the margins and, eventually, out of the picture altogether.

    At first, this shift felt like progress. But without God, the foundations that once supported identity, worth, love, dignity, and moral meaning grew thin. When the human heart loses any reference point beyond the self, everything becomes negotiable. Truth becomes personal. Purpose becomes fluid. Identity becomes fragile.

    And when life becomes difficult—as it inevitably does—self-constructed meaning begins to wobble. Hospital corridors, grief, loss, and loneliness often reveal the limitations of carefully curated self-defined purpose. In those moments, many discover an instinctive longing for something solid. Something transcendent. Something real enough to hold the weight of suffering.

    Why We Still Feel the Ache.

    Despite our technological comfort, our constant entertainment, and our unprecedented convenience, a quiet restlessness lingers in nearly every corner of modern life. Many describe a sense of spiritual depletion they cannot quite name. They change jobs, relationships, locations, habits, and online personas, yet the same unshakable ache returns.

    Perhaps that ache is not a malfunction. Perhaps it is a message.

    When we remove God from the centre, we inevitably place ourselves there—but the human heart was never built for that role. Most people, even in a secular age, continue to live as though love is real, justice is real, truth is real, beauty is real, and human dignity is real. Yet these realities sit uneasily within a worldview that insists everything is accidental and impersonal. Deep down, we sense that these things point beyond us. They whisper of a source.

    Why Our Deepest Questions Still Matter.

    We can distract ourselves for years—sometimes for decades—but we cannot outrun the deeper questions that come for us in quiet moments. If suffering exposes the limits of self-invented meaning, and if the ache of restlessness reveals a hunger that comfort cannot satisfy, then perhaps the assumptions of our age need re-examining.

    John 14:6 (ESV 2007) speaks with striking clarity:

    “Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”

    This is not an argument for nostalgia, nor is it a call to return to a past era as though it were golden. Rather, it is an invitation to consider whether removing God from the centre may have unintentionally removed the very foundation on which value, meaning, and hope rest.

    An Invitation to Look Again.

    You do not need certainty to begin exploring these questions. You do not need to call yourself religious or even know where you stand. You simply need to acknowledge that the stirrings inside you—the longings, doubts, and moments of wonder—may be pointing toward something more substantial than personal feeling.

    This is not a verdict on your life or a demand for instant belief. It is a simple invitation: look again. Consider the possibility that the restlessness within you is not an enemy to silence or suppress, but a signal. A signpost toward the One who made you.

    If God is real, then seeking Him is not a hobby or a side interest. It is the most important journey any person can take. And that journey often begins not with certainty, but with curiosity.

    What if the ache you feel is an echo of the One who calls you?
    What if meaning is not something we construct, but something we discover—something already woven into the fabric of reality?
    What if those quiet questions are not interruptions, but invitations?

    The restlessness may, in the end, be the door.

    Leave a comment

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Can We Know God Exists-Part 1 — The Question Every Worldview Must Answer

    Can We Know God Exists-Part 1 — The Question Every Worldview Must Answer

    Introduction.

    Questions everyone wants answered. Where did I come from? What is the meaning of life? How can I know right from wrong? What will happen to me after I die? Does God exist? These questions are embedded within each one of us.
    Trending generational differences may have shifted the emphasis, and the growing dominance of a secular outlook has attempted to override them. Yet these primal concerns are still shared by everyone on the planet.

    How Our Beliefs Have Shifted

    In the past few decades, it has been fashionable to categorize how Americans think by analysing the beliefs and attitudes of the generations in which they were born. As with any such categorization, there are differing opinions about how to sort the generations, and there will always be exceptions and overlap between groupings. Still, a brief overview can provide a point of reference for understanding how our values and beliefs have changed over time.

    Let us start with the Silent Generation, born during the Great Depression and World War II. Members of this group are typically conservative, religious, and financially secure. Next are the baby boomers, born after the war, many of whom rebelled against social norms and instigated the countercultural protests of the 1960s.

    Members of Generation X, born between 1965 and 1980, tend to be resistant to government and have liberal views on social issues. Millennials, born in 1981 and later, are usually better educated and more tech-savvy than earlier generations, but less likely to endorse the norms of religion, race, sexuality, and politics of their predecessors. Members of Generation Z, which began with the year 1997, are commonly considered more independent, less social, but more socially conscious, more inward-turned, and more technologically dependent.

    I do not doubt that these characterizations of the general mindsets of the generations carry considerable weight. The trend has been away from traditional values, religious belief, and social responsibility and has moved toward hedonism, materialism, secularism, and self-sufficiency. Yet those troublesome questions about origins, meaning, morality, eternity, and God’s existence remain.

    A Journey to Find Answers

    You may be reading this blog because you have reached a place in your life where these questions have risen up to confront you. You may have begun to feel that the faith you embraced in the past no longer has the answers you need. Perhaps the answers offered by secular culture seem as if they might better fit the realities you encounter.

    If this describes you, or if you are concerned about someone who is facing these questions, I urge you to accompany me on a journey to discover the answers. This is no mere excursion into trivialities dressed in platitudes written in typical religious blog jargon. I will lead you to solid answers that I will demonstrate to be firmly rooted in reality. I will show you that truth is a firm reality you can know with certainty and that meaning is possible when you align yourself with that truth.

    I will begin our journey in this first blog in the series by exploring the misconceptions inherent in secularism that have blocked off the light of truth from modern culture.

    A Roadmap for This Series

    Part One: The Bedrock of Truth
    We will consider how to find and rely on the bedrock truths that have underscored successful and satisfying lives throughout the past 20 centuries. I will show that God is no fantasy and demonstrate undeniable steps of reason that can lead you to certainty that He is real.


    Part 2: Addressing Secularism
    We will examine the weaknesses of several secular and naturalistic props to atheism, especially those explaining ultimate origins. I will demonstrate through reason, scientific evidence, and the writings of prominent scientists how secular origin theories often contradict science, reason, and observable reality.


    Note: When I use the terms naturalism or naturalistic, I mean the philosophy that asserts that nature is all that exists, that there is no supernatural realm, and that there is no transcendent God who exists outside or above nature. There may be shades of difference between naturalism, materialism, secularism, and atheism, but I will use naturalism as a convenient term to encompass these and similar beliefs that exclude God.


    Part 3: Finding Meaning
    We will turn a corner and focus on how belief in God provides the only viable foundation for meaning and embodies the truth that bathes the world in beauty and joy.

    Our Approach to Finding the Truth.

    Lest you fear that I am about to bombard you with Bible verses and Scripture proof texts to support my claims, I assure you that I will not. In fact, you may find this to be one of the strangest Christian blogs you have ever read. Nowhere in this blog do I support my arguments with biblical references. I realize that biblical proofs would be meaningless if you are sceptical of religion.
    Instead, I will make every attempt to rely solely on reason, observation, evidence, and common sense in supporting my propositions and reaching my conclusions.
    This blog began as an update of a previous idea for a blog series I wrote in August 2025. Perceiving a rising need to address the secular mindset that now dominates Western culture, I essentially ended up with an altogether different blog. As we tackle head-on the questions that people of all generations are beginning to ask, I trust that it will help you find stability in a society rapidly descending into chaos. More importantly, I believe that it will reassure you that God does indeed exist.